Left (6); Right (7) |
Triclosan
and the Controversy of its Use in Consumer Products
Triclosan is a chemical compound with
antibacterial properties that is found in many household items[1].
Canada alone has over 1,600 cosmetics and
personal care products that contain triclosan anywhere from 0.1%-0.3%[2].
The compound causes a significantly greater
reduction of bacteria on the hands when compared to plain soap, which accounts
for its popularity in hand sanitizers and cleaning products[3].
While triclosan has
beneficial properties it has been linked to various health effects. Since triclosan is lipophilic, it can bioaccumulate in tissues and may
interact with the body’s thyroid hormone as well as effect normal muscle
contraction[3]. Studies have also linked triclosan to be a depressant on the
central nervous system indicating the compound may contribute to depression[3]. Over use
of triclosan can also irritate the skin leading to rashes or sores[5].
The greatest concern over the use of
triclosan is its effects on the environment. Recently, there have been concerns
over triclosan and its ability to convert to the highly carcinogenic compound
dioxin. Triclosan’s structure allows it to convert to dioxin when exposed to
the environment[3]. One study found that river water mixed with triclosan and radiated
with UV light could convert between 1-12% of triclosan to dioxin[3]. As well,
a high level of triclosan is very toxic to aquatic organisms[4]. Most of the triclosan
we use is emptied down drained into wastewater systems. Current wastewater
treatment technologies are not specifically designed to remove triclosan
allowing it to enter the environment, disperse and persist[1]. For this reason the Canadian government is trying to urge industries to
voluntarily remove triclosan from their products. Another
concern over triclosan use is antibiotic resistance. While triclosan does not
necessarily cause mutations in bacteria, by killing off bacteria sensitive to
triclosan, it creates an environment where resistant strains can strive[3].
There are many alternatives to triclosan.
Washing hands with normal soap and water can easily get rid of any unwanted
bacteria and there are many household products and cosmetics available on the market
that is triclosan-free. As triclosan is not absolutely necessary in our
day-to-day lives and the fact that it may cause adverse affects including
harming aquatic ecosystems, increasing antibiotic resistant bacteria, and
converting to carcinogens, limiting or eliminating triclosan use may be
beneficial.
References:
1.
von der Ohe, P. C., Schmitt-Jensen, M., Slobodnik, J., Brak, W. (2011). Triclosan – the
forgotten priority substance? Environ Sci Pollut Res. DOI : 10.1007/s11356-011-0580-7
2. Government of Canada. (2013). The safety of triclosan. Retrieved
November 20, 2013 from
http://healthycanadians.gc.ca/environment-environnement/home-maison/triclosan-eng.php
3. Glaser, A. (2004). Ubiqutous triclosan: a common antibacterial
agent exposed. Pesticides and You.
24(3): 12-17
4. EMD Millipore Chemicals. (2013). Triclosan. Retrieved November
20, 2013 from
http://www.emdmillipore.com/life-science-research/triclosan/EMD_BIO-647950/p_qpKb.s1LAAoAAAEWhmEfVhTm?PortalCatalogID=merck4biosciences&CountryName=United+States+of+America
5. Pohanish, R. P. (2008). Trichlorophenols. Sittig’s Handbook of Toxic and Harzardous Chemicals and Carcinogens (5th
ed., p. 2488-2490). Norwich, N.Y.: William Andrew
6. n.a. (2010). Triclosan in consumer products [image]. Retrieved
December 5, 2013 from
http://business-ethics.com/2010/06/26/1414-the-controversy-over-triclosan-in-consumer-products/
7. Baker, S. (2010). Triclosan [image]. Retrieved December 5, 2013
from http://www.infiniteunknown.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/triclosan.jpg
No comments:
Post a Comment